Page 69 - npqh NATIONAL POLICY FOR QUALITY IN HEALTHCARE : Bridging Silos, Accelerating Improvements 2022-2026
P. 69

National Policy for Quality in Healthcare
                                                                                   National Policy for Quality in Healthcare
                                                                                       Bridging Silos, Accelerating Improvements
                                                                                       Bridging Silos, Accelerating Improvements










               This  change  in  governance  structure  for  quality  is  fundamental  in  bridging  the  silos
               between  different  quality  initiatives  and  enhance  communication  between  all  quality
               players.  The effective governance and monitoring  system should avoid  unnecessary
               bureaucracy in order to facilitate information and knowledge sharing. In addition, existing
               laws or prevalent work cultures that may hinder knowledge sharing or coordination may
               need to be reviewed. A platform should also be provided by the governing body to consider
               the views of all stakeholders, inclusive of patients and user representatives and form a
               basis  for  policy  reviews  based  on  the  stakeholders’  inputs.  These  platforms  should  be
               autonomous in their functions thereby guaranteeing impartiality. [Refer 3.7.4: Engaging
               and Communicating with Stakeholders]


               3.7.2.3 Investing in Quality


               A combination of inaccurate diagnosis, prescription errors, inappropriate and unnecessary
               treatment, insufficient or unsafe clinical facilities or practices are all prevalent across the
               globe, resulting in poor quality health services (1). For an instances, despite the fact that
               acquired  infections  can  be  easily  avoided  through  better  hygiene,  improved  infection
               control practices, and appropriate use of antimicrobials, 10% of patients hospitalised in
               low- and middle-income countries can expect to acquire an infection during their stay,
               compared to 7% in high-income countries. The economic and social costs of poor-quality
               care, including long-term disability, impairment and lost productivity, imposes additional
               spending for families and health systems.


               Therefore, optimal and prudent financial resource management are vital to the successful
               implementation of all components of quality improvement programmes. Attention must
               be focused on ensuring that QI-specific financial allocation has been made and the best
               value for money is attained. It is axiomatic that resources are scarce and that innovative
               strategies and methods should be explored to address funding limitations.
               This includes (but not limited to) allocation for:

                 -   Training / Continuous Professional Development

                 -   Reward and recognition
                 -   Implementing intervention

                 -   Conducting research

                 -   Monitoring and evaluation
                 -   Supporting local innovation












                                                                                                               67
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74