Page 97 - Malaysian Journal of Health Promotion, Vol 4 (Supplementary 1) 2022
P. 97

Malaysian Journal of Health Promotion, Vol 4 (Supplementary 1) 2022
                        th
                                                                    rd
                      14  MOH-AMM Scientific Meeting 2022 in conjunction with 23  NIH Scientific Conference Abstract Book
               thirds (75.9%) of the researchers experienced moderate and high burnout. Meanwhile, job
               satisfaction was found to have a negative relationship with the intention to leave (β =-.348,
               95% CI (B): -.768, -.273).
               DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The study found that more than one-third of the researchers had
               moderate and high-level intentions to leave. The significant predictors of intention to leave
               among  researchers  identified  were  burnout  and  job  dissatisfaction.  The  burnout  among
               researchers  is  quite  worrisome  as  more  than  two-thirds  of  the  researchers  experienced
               moderate and high burnout. By reducing burnout and job dissatisfaction, the researchers will
               increase work performance and produce high-quality research output, hence reducing the
               turnover rate.

               ID 99 IDENTIFYING QUALITY INDICATORS FOR DIABETES MELLITUS: A RAPID REVIEW

                                                  1
                                                                               1
               Normaizira Hamidi¹, Divya Nair Narayanan , Samsiah Awang¹, Khalidah Maruan , Izzatur Rahmi Mohd Ujang¹
               ¹Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health

               INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is 18.3% among Malaysians ≥ 18 years,
               affecting  3.9  million  individuals  as  reported  in  NHMS  2019.  Monitoring  of  diabetes
               necessitates  a  set  of  quality  measures  which  is  comparable  with  other  countries,  thus,
               identifying meaningful indicators is pivotal. This rapid review aimed to identify quality of care
               indicators for adults with type 2 diabetes across the continuum of care.
               METHODS: A systematic MEDLINE search was performed via PubMed for relevant studies.
               This search was supplemented by an extensive website examination of relevant government
               and international institutions. Records were included if the quality indicators were complete
               with its numerator and denominator. Data from screened records were extracted into a pre-
               determined data extraction form.
               RESULTS: Though 130 records were found using various search techniques, only 27 records
               were  eligible  for  analysis.  The  collected  indicators  were  classified  using  Donabedian's
               "structure-process-outcome" framework and assigned to six diabetes care categories. The
               final  list  of  diabetes  quality  indicators  included  190  indicators.  57%  of  quality  indicators
               identified  measure process  of  care  mainly  in the  domain  of  effectiveness,  utilisation  and
               timeliness.  35%  of  the  indicators  were  classified  under  the  category  of  epidemiology  of
               complications, 26% as risk factors for complications and 15% as epidemiology of diabetes.
               DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION:  This  review  aided  the  establishment  of  an  inventory  of
               international  diabetes  quality  indicators,  complete  with  numerators  and  denominators,
               focused on different aspects of diabetes monitoring across quality domains and levels of
               health care. This may facilitate our relevant stakeholders in indicator selections, adoption and
               adaption in the local context.

               ID 101 THE CHARACTERISTIC OF MALAYSIAN OLDER PEOPLE SUICIDES BY GENDER AND AGE
               SUBGROUPS

                                                   1
                                 1
                                                                     2
                                                                                                         2
                                                                                   2
               Nur Azmiah Zainuddin , Salwana Abu Bakar , Masrol Hafizal Ismail , Zamtira Seman , Nik Noor Syamimi Ismail
               1 Centre for Health Policy Research, Institute for Health Systems Research,  National Institutes of Health (NIH)
               2 Sector for Biostatistics & Data Repository, Management Office, National Institutes of Health (NIH)

               United Nation defines older persons as those aged 60 year and over. Developed countries
               consider people more than 65 years (65+) are old. Department of Statistic Malaysia (DOSM)


                                                                                                       71
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102