Page 123 - Malaysian Journal of Health Promotion, Vol 4 (Supplementary 1) 2022
P. 123

Malaysian Journal of Health Promotion, Vol 4 (Supplementary 1) 2022
                                                                    rd
                      14  MOH-AMM Scientific Meeting 2022 in conjunction with 23  NIH Scientific Conference Abstract Book
                        th

               INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of smoking in Malaysia among the age group of 15 years and
               above is recorded as the highest prevalence. The implementation of the smoke-free campus
               (KamBAR) policy at the university is said to be able to control smoking habits and create a
               non-smoking social norm among university residents. The purpose of this study is to evaluate
               the impact of KamBAR policy in public universities in Malaysia, the factors influenced it and
               the challenges and obstacles in its implementation.
               METHODS:  The  study  location  was  at  public  universities  in  Malaysia;  2  universities  have
               implemented KamBAR policy (KamBAR) and 2 universities have not implemented KamBAR
               policy  (XKamBAR).  Mixed  method  convergent  was  used.  The  quantitative  study  was
               conducted using self administered questionnaire on respondents from KamBAR (n=1063) and
               XKamBAR (n=1040) from September 2019-November 2019.
               RESULTS: The prevalence of smoking KamBAR and XKamBAR was 5.2% and 6.7%, respectively.
               The association between university type and knowledge of smoke free policy (p = <0.001),
               smoking attitude (p = 0.02) and smoker’s behaviour in smoking cessation attempts (p = 0.04)
               was significant. Males were more likely to smoke than females (KamBAR: 95% confidence
               interval [CI] 3.2–16.04, p<0.001; XKamBAR: 95% CI 8.55-38.47, p<0.001); females were strong
               predictor of good smoking knowledge in XKamBAR (95% CI 0.54-0.88, p=0.004, p<0.001),
               negative smoking attitude (KamBAR: 95% CI 0.1–0.29, p<0.001; XKamBAR: 95% CI 0.16–0.55)
               and negative smoking practice (KamBAR: 95% CI 0.14–0.33, p<0.001; XKamBAR; p<0.001; 95%
               CI  0.17–0.36,  p<0.001).  Good  knowledge  of  smoke  free  policy  was  strong  predictor  of
               negative  smoking  practice  (XKamBAR:  95%  CI  1.3-3.24,  p=0.002)  and  positive  smoker’s
               behaviour in smoking cessation attempts in XKamBAR (95% CI 3.46-50.65, p<0.001). Good
               smoking knowledge was strong predictor of negative smoking attitude (KamBAR: 95% CI 1.73-
               5.94,  p  <0.001;  XKamBAR:  95%  CI  1.89-5.39,  p<0.001)  and  negative  smoking  practice  in
               XKamBAR (95% CI 1.02-2.51, p = 0.04). The results of the qualitative study (semi structured
               interview, observation and document analysis) revealed the main obstacles and challenges in
               the policy implementation were creation of smoking hotspot area and weaknesses in the
               enforcement and smoking cessation services.
               DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Overall, universities implementing the KamBAR policy had lower
               smoking prevalence and better level of smoking KAP (knowledge, attitude, practice) than
               XKamBAR. Awareness of KamBAR policy and the dangers of smoking needs to be emphasized
               as it is a determining factor in policy compliance but different approaches between men and
               women need to be point up so that the impact of KamBAR policy is balanced between the
               gender. Strict enforcement, good smoking cessation services and continual health programs
               are highly recommended to support and enhance the implementation of KamBAR policy in
               order to establish and promote non-smoking social norms in universities.

               ID  147  TIME-MOTION  STUDY  TO  MEASURE  TIME  SPENT  BY  DIABETES  EDUCATORS  ON
               DIABETES CARE

               Nik Dewi Delina Nik Mohd Kamil¹, Nur Jihan Noris¹, Pangie Bakit¹, Ili Liyana Khairul Anuar¹, Ismail Saudi¹, Intan
               Syafinaz Saimy¹, Norhayati Ibrahim²
               ¹Institute for Health Management, National Institutes of Health Malaysia
               ²Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia

               INTRODUCTION: The role of the diabetes educator (DE) in primary care must be optimised to
               provide comprehensive diabetes care. Unlike in some other countries, DE in Malaysia is not a



                                                                                                       97
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128