Page 2 - APPLIED INORGANIC ANALYSIS
P. 2

PREFACE

         During  the  past  fifty  years  great advances  have  been  made  in  the
      development  of  methods  for  the determination  of  the  elements  and  in
      the  clarification  of  the  theoretical  considerations  on  which  analytical
      procedures   are  based.  As  a  consequence  very  accurate  determinations
      of many  of the  elements  can  now  be  made,  provided  they  occur  alone
      or  in  very  simple  combinations.  It  must be  confessed,  however,  that
      corresponding  advances  have  not  been  recorded  in  the  reliability  and
      accuracy  of  analyses  of  the  more  or  less  complex  mixtures  in  which
      the  elements  normally  occur.  In  other words,  methods  for separating
      the  elements  remain  much  as  they  were,  and  the  newer  methods  for
      determining  them  do  not  differ  greatly  from  the  older  methods  as
      regards  their  ''selectivity."  Correct  conditions  for  the  determination
      of  aluminum  by  precipitating  with  ammonium  hydroxide  have  been
      established,  but  the  analyst  still  has  the  problem  of  first  separating
      the  aluminum  from  the  numerous  elements  that  usually  accompany  it
      and  are  also  precipitated  by  ammonium  hydroxide.
         After  all  is  said  and  done  a  good  analyst  is  primarily  a  chemist
      who  can  quantitatively  manufacture  pure  chemicals.  The  most  elabo-
      rate  precautions  in weighing and measuring and  in  the  final determina-
      tion  of  the  element go  for  naught if the  analyst  has  failed  to  prepare
      quantitatively the  compound  on  which  the  calculation  is  based,  and  to
      free  it  quantitatively  from  all  other  compounds  that  would  affect  the
      calculation.  That this may be an  extremely difficult task can  be  judged
      by  the  errors  that  have  been  made  in  determinations  of  the  atomic
      weights,  in spite of extraordinary expenditures of time  and  effort.  For
      example,  in  1921  the  accepted  atomic weights  of  aluminum,  silicon  and
      antimony  were  27.1,  28.3,  and  120.2,  respectively,  In  1925  these  were
      changed  to  26.97,  28.06  and  121.77,  the  differences  in  parts  per  thou-
      sand  being  4.8,  8.6  and  12.9.  Today,  the  atomie  weight of  zirconium
      is  rounded  off  to  91  because  no  one  knows  how  much  hafnium  was
      contained  in  the  zirconium  compounds  on  which  the  determinations  of
      the  atomic  weight of  zirconium  were  based.
         In  addition  to  the  ordinary  difficulties,  mineral  analysis  is  very
      often  complicated  by  the  faet that ideally  pure  minerals  are  rare.  Not
      only does  isomorphism  often  introduce  components  of  related  members
      of an  isomorphous  group,  but solid solutions of unrelated  minerals  may

                                       V
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7