Page 20 - AN INTRODUCTION TO SURFACE CHEMISTRY By ERIC KEIGHTLEY RIDEAL
P. 20

DROP  WEIGHT  METHOD                  15

       a  knowledge   of the  drop  weight and  the  tip  radius  alone.  The
       following example given  by Iredale may be cited.
         The  weight  of a mercury drop detached  from  a capillary  tube of
       radius  00852  cm.  was  found  to  be  01794 gm.  Since  p = 1353
       for  mercury  the radius of  the mercury drop is 01469 em.  Hence
                            r   00852
                             01400  05801.

       From  a  graph  constructed  from  the  table above we find  that the
       tube  radius  required  to  give a drop of water  of the same charac-
       teristie ratio ', would be 0·1239 em.  Hence
                   r
                                    00852
                               K =01239'
       also  ,
               = 7280 and  p,  = 0998  whence
                         Ko,  .«     4 6
                             'Te"_ 6 dynes per cm.
                            P,o
       Many  modifications of the  drop weight method  have  been  utilised
       in practice.
         Instead  of  measuring  the  weight directly  we  may  calculate  it
       from  the  volume and  the  density:  the  drop volume  method  has
       been  applied by Harkins chiefly to the measurement of the tension
       between  two  liquid  phases,  and  it  probably  falls  little  short  in
       accuracy  from  the  previous  method.  More  frequently it has been
       modified,  especially  for  biochemical  purposes,  as  a  drop number
       method:  that  is, a  known  volume of  liquid  is allowed  to  flow out
       of a  tube,  and  the number of drops  formed  is compared with  that
       formed  by a standard fluid.  'This method  is  necessarily very rough,

         Bubble pressure.
         By  reversing the position of liquid and gas assumed  in the  pre-
       ceding section we obtain the bubble pressure  method.  The  theory
       corresponds closely with that of the drop weight and  has been de-
       veloped by  Cantor,  Feustel and Schr~dinger (An, d. Physik,  xLVI.
       413,  1915).
         The equation derived  is
                        ·-»-3;-3
   15   16   17   18   19   20